With more than 50 million active users, Amazon’s recruiting platform has the potential to be a valuable source of new talent for organisations looking to recruit for the future.
But some of the top recruiting services, such as Amazons recruitment platform and Amazon’s recruitment portal, are not so keen to share their recruitment rankings with their users.
The recruitment platforms on these two platforms have a lot in common, but some are doing their best to keep the information about their services confidential, while others are openly sharing their recruitment information.
As a result, some of these recruitment services have decided to keep their ranking of their services in-house and make their information available for the general public to access.
However, as the numbers of companies looking to attract new talent grow, the recruitment services on these platforms are going to have to make some tough decisions about which information they are going dole out to their users and users of their platforms.
The top recruiting agencies, such the UK-based Amazos, are taking a proactive approach by sharing their top recruiters’ rankings and their hiring statistics.
However this has resulted in some users of these recruiting services being upset by their top performers being identified.
The company is taking this approach to address the complaints of users and, as a result of this, Amazones ranking of its top recruiter is now public.
The top recruiter for the year is listed as Michael Stokes, who was recently promoted to director of recruitment.
A lot of companies have been taking a similar approach to make their recruiting platforms more transparent and, in the process, create a more competitive recruitment marketplace.
Companies like Amazon are not the only ones making this decision.
Google, Facebook, and other social media platforms are also now publicly sharing their ranking information and hiring statistics of their top talent.
While it may be a good move for those who want to be more competitive, there are some downsides to this approach.
Users will be less likely to choose the top recruit in a company that is not their favourite, or a company with a lower ranking will have more competition.
In addition, users may feel that their information is not being shared accurately and will not be able to see what is going on behind the scenes.
On top of all of this there is also a concern that it will be difficult for recruiters to understand what is happening behind the scene when it comes to their recruiting ranking.
Companies are also not the first to be taking a stance on this.
LinkedIn has recently started to post its recruiting ranking for its employees and, at the same time, removed its ranking from the rankings of its members, effectively removing it from the top of the recruiting platform.
The recruiting industry is still a fairly new one and, so far, it seems as though most companies are taking the right steps to ensure that their rankings and hiring data are not shared with their user base.
If you are an employee or recruit who is concerned about your recruitment ranking, here are some things you can do to protect yourself from being in the wrong position.
This article was originally published on The Business Insider website.